Results of Public Consultation (Spring 2017)

A full analysis of the second consultation carried out in May/June of this year has now been completed.   Here is a summary of the views of those who responded during the consultation period with regard to the Conway Park Improvement Plan.

The Friends of Conway Park committee group now intend to liaise with Preston City Council in order to formulate a plan of action based on these results.   The plan will of course reflect the opinion of the residents who took part in this, our second consultation.

The FOCP group would like to thank everyone who took the time to express their views during these consultation periods.

Summary of survey results spring 2017
Visits; Use of Facilities
> 40+% weekly 34% weekly
>25+% daily 27% occasional
<20% occasional 17% never
<10% monthly 12% daily
10% monthly
Uses % who’d use park more if improved
52% play area 84%
42% walking
33% walking dog
18% football
Priorities ( in descending order) 1st 2nd 3rd 4th etc.
overall 1st Play Area improvements 58 11 7 6
2nd perimeter path 26 27 12 12
close 3rd/4th more benches 8 13 20 21
close 3rd/4th drainage to play area 3 23 21 13
5th wildflowers 4 10 11 15
6th trees 3 7 11 9
7th parking 6 8 6 7
8th events area >1 4 8 7
9th drainage to events area >1 4 7 9
Age group of respondants Post code of respondants
36% 40-65 in descending order
33% 18-40 most PR2 9– 3– 7– 2– 8– 1– 6–
21% 65+ PR4 0–
5.50% under 11 PR1 8– 5–
4.50% 11 to 18 PR6 0–
PR3 1– 5– 0–
Gender of respondants 1 X BB7
M 1 X CH3
F
Individual comments
22 Thanks / encouragement for project
2 Leave park as it is (strongly)
6 want drainage improvements
33 Play area improvements needed
3 Play area is ok as it is
20 want more benches incl picnic
18 want more bins (w lids & larger)
16 want perimeter path (away from houses)
13 want better paths / access (from Wychnor & Landowne, to P.A., top of field to Woods, E.side of park, but traveller & motorbike proof)
10 Don’t want extra paths/ cyling route
1 & 1 more drainage specifically on slopes near paths
2 wanted stream banking improving
14 Don’t want the events area (or rather I suspect hard surfacing & big events)
11 Don’t want the zip wire / teen/gymn stuff (on field)
5 were against the aerial slide
3 were for it
6 want an all weather surfaced games area or permanent goals
4 wanted a skatepark / BMX/cycletrack / something for young adults
3 wanted accessible equipment / something for under 3’s
1 each wanted trampolines.; single springer.; climbing kit;. Sand area;, role play/theme
3 wanted the existing roundabout removing
12 concern / request for resolution to football parking
8 Don’t want extra parking (unless funded by Cadley F.C.)
1 concern / request for resolution to football litter
7 concern / request for resolution to security / lighting
10 concern / request for resolution to mud / play area surface
4 concern / request for resolution to sufficient maintenance
4 concern / request for resolution to specific areas (Ashwood Rd steps, railway tunnel, lansdowne Hill)football litter
7 Don’t want more trees (strongly, esp.@entrance / nr. houses)
4 wanted more trees / natural screening from railway
3 wanted more shrubs/ general planting
5 wanted a café/drinks availability/WC’s /hall
1 wanted a sensory area
1 wanted information boards
5 wanted dogs only on leads / a dog enclosure/ non footy – dog area @ weekends / trees or hedge for shade for dogs on perimeter of play area
3 wanted wildflowers / wildlife